Martin
Luther King Jr. was a still new minister in the Montgomery area, when
asked to lead the Montgomery Improvement Association and lead the black
community of Montgomery in a boycott of city buses. Blacks were not
able to sit closer than the 5th row and were required to give up their
seats to white persons.

During the 381 day boycott, Dr. King’s house was destroyed by fire,
he was physically attacked, and he spent 2 weeks in jail for hindering
the smooth operation of a bus. However, Dr. King’s leadership, his
ability to galvanize the community into sending a message against
apartheid in Alabama, was the catalyst for a district court ruling that
Alabama’s bus laws were unconstitutional. The United States Supreme
Court upheld the decision and Alabama was forced change the laws.
This boycott was the birth of a civil rights leader - some might say
the defining moment of Martin Luther King Jr’s life. I don’t know about
that. My opinion is his life as a civil rights leader was defined well
before that - perhaps by his grandfather. In any case, the rest of Dr.
King’s life would be one of perseverance and resistance to continued
apartheid in the United States.
Some people indict Dr. King because of the people in history who
influenced his political beliefs. To my way of thinking, right or
wrong, Dr. King was embracing ideas that ran counter to the system he
saw as the foundation for apartheid in America. He wasn’t a communist -
that was too God-less. He wasn’t a capitalist - but only Dr. King knows
why. We can only guess he sometimes felt a democratic socialism was the
answer to apartheid. History corrects that notion without a lot of
“what-ifs” and, while I can only guess, I believe Dr. King would
recognize that.
Others invoke Dr. King’s name. But, I have not seen anyone who does
so and does Dr. King justice. These days, our so-called civil rights
leaders don’t resist apartheid; they try to reverse its direction. They
don’t fight for equality, but preference. Rather than fight for
inclusion, they fight for exclusivity. They don’t look for fairness for
the poor, but handouts. They are not civil rights leaders; more like
influence loan-sharks.
To me, the most cogent evidence in the different between Dr. King
and contemporary “civil rights leaders” is simply this: When Dr King
was autopsied, he was said to have the body of a 60 year old. He was
39. Compare that to all of the blabbermouths out there invoking his
name - how are they looking compared to their age? What do they
persevere?
In order to properly honor the ideals of true equality of Dr. Martin
Luther King Jr, we should all fight to preserve the goals of them. His
legacy is not the words he spoke, it’s what we - all of us - do with
them.
No Pundit Intended